| Citation(s): | 241 Va. 96 (400 S.E.2d 516) |
| Case Name: | Habel v. Industrial Development Authority of the City of Lynchburg |
| Court: | Supreme Court of Va. |
| Record Number: | 900482 |
| Date of Decision: | January 11, 1991 |
| Appealed From: | Appeal from judgment of City of Lynchburg Circuit Court Perrow (Mosby G., III), J. |
| Outcome: | Rev. & fin. judg. |
| Opinion(s): | Whiting, J. |
| Briefs: |
1. Opening brief of appellants (900482/900498: Stoneburner, guardian ad litem) [iv, 49]. 2. Brief of appellants (900482: Habel; Kabler) [vi, 50, (1)]. 3. Brief of appellee (900482/900498: Development Authority) [vii, 60]. 4. Reply brief of appellants (900482) [(1), iii, 15]. 5. Joint appendix: Vol. I (900482/900498) [vi, 510]. 6. Joint appendix: Vol. II (900482/900498) [vi, 511-1096]. 7. Joint appendix: Vol. III (900482/900498) [vi, 1097-1669]. 8. Joint appendix: Vol. IV (900482/900498) [vi, 1670-2183]. 9. Joint appendix: Vol. V (900482/900498) [vi, 2184-2783]. 10. Joint appendix: Vol. VI (900482/900498) [vi, 2784-3423]. |
| Notes: | Decided with: Stoneburner v. Industrial Development Authority of the City of Lynchburg (900498). For lower court decision, see Indus. Dev. Auth. of the City of Lynchburg v. All Taxpayers, Property Owners and Citizens of the City of Lynchburg, 19 Va. Cir. 198 (1990). |